Well written, Mr. Croft. Well-presented arguments. Clearly set forth, so that I can understand all of them. And reject them. For many of the reasons Pinker mentioned. But then, I suppose that Pinker has also now been consigned to Woke Hell.
Knight has it precisely right: "And like all groups of ideologues, they will eventually implode under the force of their own purity criteria."
Such a straw man. Nobody was arguing that Dawkins doesn't have free speech. They are saying it's absurd that an organization that values free inquiry, open debate of ideas, and rationality suddenly rejects all of these in favor of ideology and groupthink.
Well written, Mr. Croft. Well-presented arguments. Clearly set forth, so that I can understand all of them. And reject them. For many of the reasons Pinker mentioned. But then, I suppose that Pinker has also now been consigned to Woke Hell.
Knight has it precisely right: "And like all groups of ideologues, they will eventually implode under the force of their own purity criteria."
But at least they'll be pure.
Such a straw man. Nobody was arguing that Dawkins doesn't have free speech. They are saying it's absurd that an organization that values free inquiry, open debate of ideas, and rationality suddenly rejects all of these in favor of ideology and groupthink.
Here, here!!